Comments on FTPBP #5 - 2012
Jurisdiction Position Comments

WYOMING
Support

WEST VIRGINIA
Support

VIRGINIA
Support

VERMONT
Oppose

UTAH
Oppose

TEXAS
Support

SASKATCHEWAN
Support Good idea.

QUEBEC
Support If updated regularly, the exemptions database will be more helpful.

PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
Support

PENNSYLVANIA
Undecided

ONTARIO
Support The database is currently being under utilized despite being redesigned in 2010 based on membership feedback. Ontario believes by making the update a mandatory requirement, it will allow for greater reliance on the database by providing reliable and relevant information in one central location, the IFTA, Inc. website. 

OHIO
Support

NOVA SCOTIA
Support

NORTH DAKOTA
Undecided

NORTH CAROLINA
Support

NEW YORK
Undecided

NEW MEXICO
Oppose

NEW JERSEY
Support

NEW HAMPSHIRE
Oppose

NEW BRUNSWICK
Support

NEVADA
Support

NEBRASKA
Support

MONTANA
Support

MISSOURI
Support Missouri supports and also apologizes to the members as its exemption database has had incorrect information published and has not been updated to reflect the proper information.

MINNESOTA
Support

Minnesota agrees it is important for a properly completed tax return to have the data current  and readily available.  It may be helpful to have a summary page that lists the exemptions for all jurisdictions rather than querying several documents in determining the exemptions when completing the IFTA tax return.   


MICHIGAN
Support

MASSACHUSETTS
Support

MARYLAND
Support

MANITOBA
Support

MAINE
Support

KANSAS
Support

Exemption data is very important and needs to be kept up to date for both the carrier and the jurisdictions.  Audit needs accurate data in order to complete audits on behalf of fellow jurisdictions.


IOWA
Support

The current data may not be reliable because mandatory reporting is not required. It is better to direct the carriers to IFTA website instead of multiple states for the information.


ILLINOIS
Support

IDAHO
Support

CONNECTICUT
Support We support the ballot however we do have a question for the authors.  How would the program compliance review teams propose to enforce this requirement if passed?

COLORADO
Support

CALIFORNIA
Oppose

BRITISH COLUMBIA
Support

BC would also suggest there be a modification to the IFTA exemption database so that it informs jurisdictions and licencees when a jurisdiction has made a change.


Audit Committee
Support

The AC is in support of this ballot.  Additionally, the AC recommends an archive of prior year exemptions be maintained for the purposes of conducting audits.


ARIZONA
Support

ALBERTA
Undecided

ALABAMA
Support
Support: 33
Oppose: 5
Undecided: 4
View Ballot Comments