IFTA Ballot Proposals Comments

IFTA Ballot Comments

You can now browse through past ballot comments using the tools below.


Support: 1
Oppose: 6
Undecided: 0

2nd Period Comments on BALLOT #5 - 2022

Jurisdiction Position Comments

KENTUCKY
Support

NEW JERSEY
Oppose New jersey is in opposition of Ballot 5-2022.  Based on our review of this matter this is an infrequent occurrence that will lock jurisdictions into an agreement that will result in an interest penalty being rendered due to another jurisdiction being untimely, which will not be beneficial for the timely jurisdiction. 

The Ballot does not consider unforeseen occurrences such as with COVID 19 or natural disasters that may cause a hiccup in timely submission of transmittal data.

I believe this Ballot should be rewritten to focus on the jurisdiction that violates directly, and factor in considerations of what constitutes unforeseen circumstances that may cause a delay.

RHODE ISLAND
Oppose The issue has only happened three times in twelve years.  If it was an ongoing issue, then yes I would probably agree to it, but it doesn’t appear to be so (possibly could have occurred from system conversion?). 

SASKATCHEWAN
Oppose

TENNESSEE
Oppose

WEST VIRGINIA
Oppose

WYOMING
Oppose