IFTA Ballot Proposals Comments

IFTA Ballot Comments

You can now browse through past ballot comments using the tools below.


1st Period Comments on FTPBP #1 - 2021

Jurisdiction Position Comments

ALABAMA
Support

ALBERTA
Support

BRITISH COLUMBIA
Support

CALIFORNIA
Support

IDAHO
Support

INDIANA
Support

KANSAS
Support

KENTUCKY
Support

MAINE
Support

MANITOBA
Support

MARYLAND
Support

MICHIGAN
Support

MINNESOTA
Support

MISSOURI
Support

NEBRASKA
Support

NEVADA
Support

NEW BRUNSWICK
Support

NEW HAMPSHIRE
Support

NEWFOUNDLAND
Support

NORTH CAROLINA
Support The existing language provides that after the Final Determination Finding of Non-Compliance the DRC must initiate a dispute. This language is absent in the proposed ballot. This could be problematic where the Rule does not place an obligation on the DRC to proceed with the dispute process. Specifically, the ballot only provides that the Final Determination Finding of Non-Compliance "shall be forwarded" the DRC.

ONTARIO
Support

QUEBEC
Support The article R1555.200.020 is clear as to the outcome of the vote if it obtains 2/3 of the required affirmative votes but it's silent as to the outcome if the threshold is not reached.
We believe this comment doesn't add anything and could be deleted.

RHODE ISLAND
Oppose

SASKATCHEWAN
Support

SOUTH DAKOTA
Support

WASHINGTON
Support
Support: 25
Oppose: 1
Undecided: 0