IFTA Ballot Proposals Comments

IFTA Ballot Comments

You can now browse through past ballot comments using the tools below.


2nd Period Comments on FTPBP #2 - 2021

Jurisdiction Position Comments

ALABAMA
Support

CALIFORNIA
Support

KANSAS
Support

KENTUCKY
Oppose Unsure how these would be counted and/or reviewed by other jurisdictions.

MAINE
Oppose We do give the carrier many opportunities to learn from us the record keeping requirements.  We do not perform record reviews for IRP and do not believe a record review for a tax return is appropriate and do not see this as auditing on behalf of all member jurisdictions. 

It appears this ballot would allow a record review to be conducted on a carrier audited in the past.

MANITOBA
Support

MISSOURI
Oppose Nothing explains what is required to get an audit credit for a record review, what is considered education? How many record reviews equal an audit? How will this be monitored?

NEVADA
Oppose records review should be allowed to convert to audit and assessment.  our job is to protect fuel tax revenue and if reveals underreporting of tax, the assessment must occur

NEW BRUNSWICK
Oppose New Brunswick does not feel that a records review provides the same level of control as an audit.  Records could be accurate but not properly utilized for filling.  NB does an educational visit with every new account.

PENNSYLVANIA
Support

RHODE ISLAND
Oppose
Support: 5
Oppose: 6
Undecided: 0