IFTA Ballot Proposals Comments

IFTA Ballot Comments

You can now browse through past ballot comments using the tools below.


2nd Period Comments on STPBP #5 - 2021

Jurisdiction Position Comments

ALABAMA
Support

ALBERTA
Support

CALIFORNIA
Support

IDAHO
Support

KANSAS
Support

KENTUCKY
Support

MAINE
Undecided The passing of this ballot could result in the need to create new reports to be part of the audit report.  The proposed effective date, January 1, 2022 is to soon to allow this to happen.  If our calculation is correct voting would close on this short track ballot after the proposed effective date.  I would suggest that the proposed effective date be January 1, 2023 or allow R1655 to determine the effective date.

MANITOBA
Support

MISSOURI
Support

NEVADA
Support

NEW BRUNSWICK
Support

NEWFOUNDLAND
Support

NORTH CAROLINA
Support It may be more clear to use the same language that is used in R930 by referencing the period as the “tax” reporting period.
 
Therefore, consider the following revision:
 
"All items listed below, except penalty .045, must be presented in the billing summary by tax reporting period."
 
Also, the sponsor should take note of the typography (layout) of A460. It consists of the general description of the report type followed by the required elements. For example, A460.100 is presented as follows:
 
".100  General Information:
 
.005  Name of base jurisdiction;
 
.010  Auditor’s name;
 
.015  Licensee’s name;
 
. . . ."
 
 Therefore, more detailed requirements, such as how the billing information must be reported, may be more appropriate in the opening paragraph of A460.

ONTARIO
Support

QUEBEC
Support

RHODE ISLAND
Support Support

WEST VIRGINIA
Support

WYOMING
Support
Support: 17
Oppose: 0
Undecided: 1