IFTA Ballot Proposals Comments

IFTA Ballot Comments

You can now browse through past ballot comments using the tools below.

1st Period Comments on FTPBP #1 - 2025

Jurisdiction Position Comments

Attorney Advisory Committee
    • In the “Intent” section, it states that the ballot is being submitted to consider changing the IFTA Articles of Agreement. However, the proposal amends the IFTA Procedures Manual (not the Agreement).
    • It is suggested that P1110.400.005 be updated to state, “Number of total IFTA accounts audited” for consistency with the reference to “number of total IFTA accounts” in P1110.300.005.
    • Including the new requirements after P1110.400.015 seems disjointed. Rather than repealing and replacing P1110.400 with all of the requirements reordered, it is suggested that the new requirements be incorporated into existing P1110.400.005 (see below).
    • It may also be useful to require a breakdown of the number of low-distance and high-distance accounts audited that resulted in financial changes. If so, the new requirements could be added into existing P1110.400.010 (see below).
    • It is suggested that the proposed amendment be updated as follows:

    .400 Audit Information

    • .005   Number of total IFTA accounts audited, as well as a breakdown of the number of low-distance and high-distance accounts audited;
    • .010   Number of total IFTA accounts audited resulting in financial changes to one or more jurisdictions, as well as a breakdown of the number of low-distance and high-distance accounts audited resulting in financial changes to one or more jurisdictions;
    • .015  A jurisdiction that has a Records Review program established conforming to section A510 shall report the total number of record reviews completed for the year on the annual report;

CONNECTICUT		 Support Connecticut is in support of this ballot. This information is currently tracked and can be provided.

INDIANA		 Support Indiana Supports this ballot.

IOWA		 Support Iowa is in favor of this ballot. 

KANSAS		 Support

KENTUCKY		 Support

MANITOBA		 Support

MARYLAND		 Support Maryland currently tracks this information and would not be difficult for us to include in our annual report.

MICHIGAN		 Support

NEVADA		 Support

NEW BRUNSWICK		 Support

NEWFOUNDLAND		 Support

NORTH CAROLINA		 Support North Carolina has no comments for this ballot and supports it as currently written.

OKLAHOMA		 Support

PENNSYLVANIA		 Support

QUEBEC		 Support Quebec supports this ballot and as stated by Maryland, such information can easily be included in the annual report.

SASKATCHEWAN		 Support Saskatchewan tracks this information already so it would not be onerous to add it to the Annual Report

SOUTH DAKOTA		 Support
Support: 19
Oppose: 0
Undecided: 0

© Copyright 2025 IFTA, Inc. All Rights Reserved