IFTA Ballot Proposals Comments

IFTA Ballot Comments

You can now browse through past ballot comments using the tools below.

FTPBP #6 • 2026

2nd Period comments

Jurisdiction feedback for FTPBP #6.

11Support
0Oppose
0Undecided
JurisdictionPositionComments
ALBERTAALBERTASupport
CALIFORNIACALIFORNIASupportThe Jurisdiction of California Supports this ballot. California appreciates the IFTA Agreement Procedures Committee revising the ballot to address comments and concerns expressed by the membership during the initial comment period and the Annual Business Meeting. California supports the intent of the ballot and agrees that there should be clarification to the definition of “Base Jurisdiction” and how it applies to leased vehicles. We support the language in the ballot that indicates the party responsible for reporting to IFTA.
CONNECTICUTCONNECTICUTSupport
DELAWAREDELAWARESupportThe new language is agreeable.
INDIANAINDIANASupport
KENTUCKYKENTUCKYSupport
MARYLANDMARYLANDSupport
NEVADANEVADASupport
NEW BRUNSWICKNEW BRUNSWICKSupport
PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDPRINCE EDWARD ISLANDSupportNew language meets our concerns.
WYOMINGWYOMINGSupport
© Copyright 2026 IFTA, Inc. All Rights Reserved